That is according to a survey released by Small Hearts just.

‘Early recognition is completely critical to the successful treatment of congenital heart defects and, in countless cases, it saves lives.’ Foresight is 20/20 Those households that did know their child had a CHD before giving birth reaped huge benefits from knowing in advance: Related StoriesCHOP's Buerger Middle for Advanced Pediatric Treatment celebrates grand openingStudy: Visceral body fat in early pregnancy may increase risk of gestational diabetesHSS researchers help identify lupus individuals at increased risk of issue pregnanciesThree out of five said they gave birth at a medical center more equipped to handle the care of newborns with a CHDOne in five prepared themselves mentally and emotionally for the arrival of a seriously ill child Others did their homework: 14.9 % of respondents said they arranged for a pediatric cardiologist in advance of their baby’s arrival, and 5.8 % said that knowing beforehand was most beneficial because it gave them time to accomplish research on CHDs through the pregnancy More Survey Results Four out of five respondents said neither parent of the heart child had any family history of CHDs Giving birth to a child with a CHD was more prevalent for women in their 30s than in virtually any other age group Three out of four respondents possess only one child with a congenital heart defect; 3.6 % possess several children with a CHDNearly three out of five respondents said their heart kid has two or more CHDs; 42.0 % said their center child has one CHD The most typical CHD among children of respondents was Hypoplastic Still left Heart Syndrome , an extremely serious heart defect that occurs when the still left side of the heart will not develop completely..Federal PPE assistance and requirements issued recently by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and OSHA include the usage of fit-tested N95 respirators by healthcare workers rather than the use of standard medical masks. According to these organizations–representing scientists, infectious disease specialists and healthcare professionals dedicated to healthcare quality, safety and infections control–this guidance will not reflect the best available scientific evidence. Their letter to the Light House cited two recent research demonstrating that the usage of N95 respirators will not offer additional safety over that provided by the use of medical masks. Related StoriesSocial and environmental processes associated with 2009 H1N1 pandemic outbreaks in MexicoSoft palate research reveals how flu infections find the capability to move between peopleStudy: Influenza vaccines offer sustained security up to six months during flu seasonMark Rupp, MD, president of SHEA called the existing requirements ‘deeply flawed’ and expressed his concern over the ‘potential for considerable untoward effects’ that could result from the assistance.